Jennifer Rosdail | San Francisco Real Estate

Market Conditions


Conforming Loan Limits Dropping October 1, 2011

by admin | Thursday, 25 August, 2011

Eric Nelson of Silicon Valley Funding writes:

In 2008, as a response to the collapse of the mortgage market, federal regulators created a new category of mortgage, the high-balance conforming loan.  Since that time, loans have been available up to $729,750 in high-cost areas at rates lower than those for full “Jumbo” mortgages.

Conforming loans are those that have a loan balance under $417,000 which can be re-sold by an originating lender on the Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac federally sponsored mortgage markets. This allows the lender to re-lend the same funds over and over again and is important to the liquidity of the lending market.  The high balance conforming limits applies to mortgages between $417,001 and $729,750.  This program was created to support the economy by assisting high-balance borrowers during the financial crisis and was temporary.

Starting October 1, 2011, the high balance conforming loan limit will drop to $625,500.  This in turn means that interest rates on these loan amounts between $625,500 and $729,750 will be HIGHER starting October 1, since they will no longer be backed by the government. After October 1, any mortgage over $625,500 will officially be a “Jumbo.”

 Interest rates this week are among the lowest we’ve seen in 2011 and it is not expected that the federal government will extend the high balance conforming loans up to the $729,750 level again in the near future.  Fixed rate loans have seen the largest drop and are currently the lowest interest rates we have had in the past 40 years.

 If you are planning a purchase or refinance and you will need a loan amount between $625,500 and $729,750 you should get the process started immediately.

 Eric can be reached at eric@svcfunding.com  and 408-268-2442, and has been helping people finance their homes since 1987.

It’s all happening in the city, eventually

by admin | Tuesday, 28 June, 2011

By Tara Tran • Jun 23rd, 2011

California’s big cities are projected to lead the way in the state’s job recovery and the Bay Area is forecasted to be the starting point for the state’s employment resurgence. The Silicon Valley boom is no small part of that push.

However, a bifurcated recovery is expected throughout California. In contrast to the state’s inland and central valleys where the local economy depends more on residential construction and commuting, the Bay Area and other like-minded California coastal hubs are likely to experience more job growth on account of their diversified and technology-driven industries.

Although a job upturn will be slow, economists of the UCLA Anderson Forecast predict employment in California will grow 1.7% in 2011, 2.4% in 2012 and 3.1% in 2013.

The UCLA Anderson Forecast of employment does not parallel first tuesday’s forecast for the next several years. We believe 2011 will be very weak in job growth through the beginning of 2012. Parts of the nation are getting up to speed, but we are not ready to take off just yet. Much corrective action is needed before we can settle down for any long pleasant recovery. [For a forecast of employment in California and the implications it has for the housing market, see the Market Chart, Jobs Move Real Estate.]

The Anderson percentage predictions calculate an addition of 239,328 jobs in 2011. This would bring California’s total employment to 14,317,427 by end of 2011. California presently (as of May 31, 2011) has 14,071,600 paying jobs and we do not see anywhere near an additional 250,000 jobs coming in by the end of 2011 as would be needed to meet the Anderson forecast. But we will see – it would definitely be nice for rental properties.

Anderson forecasts California will have 14,661,045 jobs by end of 2012 and 15,115,538 by end of 2013. One half year more of that kind of job growth and by mid-2014 we will have recovered all the jobs lost since the December 2007 peak of 15,348,200 jobs. first tuesday senses the full recovery in jobs will not come for another two years, in 2016. December 2011 numbers will enlighten all of us as we simply do not now know what consumer confidence numbers will show after a year of this most sluggish recovery.

The Anderson numbers seem high to us, but this volume of job creation in California is not out of the question. February, March and April of 2011 each saw an increase of at least 36,000 jobs. Only at that pace would we would easily attain the Anderson numbers.

California employment trends also forecast changes for demographics since wherever these jobs do appear, people will follow. This job forecast for coastal communities holds weight, especially since California’s job-hungry and mobile-minded Generation Y (Gen-Y) continues to express its preference to live in more  intimate, low-maintenance housing closer to their work – essentially a life in the city. It’s only a plus for them as the city is just the place where the more technical jobs they want will be. [For more information on the coming role of Gen-Y in California real estate, see the October 2010 article, The demographics forging California’s real estate market:  a study of forthcoming trends and opportunities – Part I.]

With employment scarce and the demand for work frantic, expect California’s demographics – led by Gen-Y – to shift significantly from its post-1980 suburban sprawl. Also a word to agents, brokers and investors: anticipate the demand for rentals and multi-family housing condo sales to go up – in the city, that is.

Source: firsttuesdayjournal.com

Copyright © 2011 by first tuesday Realty Publications, Inc. Readers are encouraged to reprint or distribute this information with credit given to the first tuesday Journal Online — P.O. Box 20069, Riverside, CA 92516.

Weekly Market Charts

by admin | Monday, 27 June, 2011

These are market dynamics charts for San Francisco houses, condos, co-ops, TICs and 2-4 unit buildings. They track weekly activity for the past 6 months through the week ending June 19, 2011. 

For activity reported to MLS, per Broker Metrics.

Listings Accepting Offers
After slowing down in the first 2 weeks of June, market activity as measured by home listings accepting offers zipped back up to May levels. And May was a busy month.

click to enlarge

Percentage of Listings Accepting Offers
This metric also increased dramatically in the last week, again comparable to May.

click to enlarge

New Listings Coming on Market
Typically, the number of new listings decreases as spring goes into summer. This began to happen last week, but it’s too early to know if this is just a normal weekly fluctuation or the beginning of a seasonal slowdown in new inventory.

click to enlarge

Homes for Sale
Inventory of homes for sale dropped a small bit, but basically remained stable.

click to enlarge

Why It’s Time To Buy

by Paragon Specific | Tuesday, 7 June, 2011

“Why It’s Time To Buy

Back in June 2006, when the housing market peaked, the prospect of a five-year national housing bust seemed unimaginable to most people. And yet here we are, with the latest Standard & Poor’s Case-Shiller index showing that prices hit new bear-market lows, falling back to 2002 levels nationally and to 1990s levels in some battered regions.

Despite all the gloom, however, there are growing indications that it is a good time to buy. Mortgage rates, which fell to 4.55% for the week ending June 2, according to Freddie Mac, are near 50-year lows. Homes have become more affordable than they have been in years: According to Moody’s Analytics, the ratio of home prices to income is now 20.9% lower than the 15-year average through 2010, and 12.5% lower than the 1989-2004 average. A historic glut of homes, meanwhile, has created a buyer’s market: There were about 15 million vacant homes in the U.S. last year, according to John Burns Real Estate ConsultingInc.—some 3.1 million more than normal.”

Click here to read the rest of the article.

Who’s Right about the San Francisco Home Market?

by admin | Friday, 6 May, 2011

Is It Strengthening or Declining?

Some of our readers have been understandably confused between the bad news reported elsewhere and our recent reports of a strengthening market in San Francisco. Besides the possibility of specific agendas, there are some legitimate reasons behind the apparent disconnect:

  • Much of the data reported elsewhere, such as the Case-Shiller Index, is for the San Francisco “metro area” comprised of 5 or more counties. We focus only on the city and county of San Francisco, which is its own, specific market (or actually its own specific collection of neighborhood markets).
  • Our data is typically 2 to 4 months ahead of that reported elsewhere. When the media is headlining the median sales price or Case-Shiller Index for February (reflecting accepted-offer activity in December and January), we have market data straight from MLS for April, both for closed sales and newly accepted offers (which is the most current market data available). When a market starts to heat up, as ours has in 2011, we are well ahead of the news curve.
  • Instead of comparing a single statistic, say one month’s median sales price to another’s (last month’s, last year’s, peak values in 2007/ 2008), to make a dramatic statement, we try to show the larger picture using 7 to 10 statistical measures over the longer term, in order to show trends beyond normal and relatively meaningless monthly fluctuations. (Median prices may, but actual market values don’t jump up, down, up, down significantly by month.)
  • All our data comes directly from the Multiple Listing Service and Broker Metrics, and we can provide the hard data behind all our charts.

    As illustrated below, indications continue of strong buyer demand amid a limited supply of homes for sale: as mentioned before, this typically does not result in a decline in values. In unit sales, the SF home market is up YTD about 5% over 2010 and up 7% in accepted offer activity — with an inventory of home listings that is 16% below last year’s (on April 30) and without the double homebuyer tax credit which fueled last spring’s surge.

    Whether this active real estate market will continue is unknown, but current signs are positive.

  • MEDIAN SALES PRICE is that price at which half the sales occur for more and half for less. It can be, and often is, affected by other factors besides changes in market values, such as short-term or seasonal changes in inventory or buying trends (as happened in January and February). If market values are truly changing, the median price will consistently rise or sink over a longer term than just 2 or 3 months.
  • DAYS ON MARKET (DOM) are the number of days between a listing going on market and accepting an offer. Averages can get pulled out of whack by a few sales where the days on market were very high, and also by agents who don’t report their accepted offers in a timely manner. What’s important is the trend. The lower the average DOM, the hotter the market.
  • MONTHS SUPPLY OF INVENTORY (MSI) reflects the number of months it would take to sell the existing inventory of homes for sale at current market conditions. The lower the MSI, the stronger the market.
  • Statistics are generalities, subject to fluctuation due to a variety of reasons. All information herein is derived from sources deemed reliable, but may contain errors and omissions, and is not warranted. Sales not reported to MLS are not included in this analysis. All numbers should be considered approximate.

    April Overview
    Of the SF houses and condos that sold in April, 71% accepted offers relatively quickly and averaged a sales price that was 99.6% of asking price. Many sold with multiple offers. This reflects a buyer pool jumping all over houses deemed appealing and reasonably priced. The remaining 29% that sold had 1 or more price reductions, took much longer to sell, and closed at a significant discount to original asking price. And for every 2 listings that sold, one listing expired without selling, typically due to being perceived as overpriced. Buyer demand is strong, but they’re not buying everything.

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Median Sales Prices for SF Houses
    This chart shows the overall house median sales price over the past 18 months (red line), the median just for distressed houses (blue), and the median just for regular, non-distressed house sales (green). Even as distressed house median price fell in the last 2 months, the median price for regular houses has increased for the past 3 (to its second highest point in 18 months). Why the plunge in January? Holiday season dynamics: the high-end market closed down in late November/ December, resulting in fewer high-end sales in early 2011. At the same time, there was a surge in distress home sales, especially as a percentage of sales. Fewer high-end sales and more low-end sales = lower median price, which then corrected as the 2011 market began. In many ways, the distress and non-distress home markets are different markets: different price points, often different neighborhoods, in different condition. Note that even as the median for regular house sales increased in April, the overall median was pulled down by the number and price point of distress sales.

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Median Sales Prices for SF Condos
    We see a similar situation with condo sales in the city: a declining median sales price in early 2011 mostly due to holiday season inventory and buying dynamics, mostly unrelated to values, then self corrects as the market gets back to normal.

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Overall SF Median Home Sales Price
    This chart looks back over the past 25 months at how the overall median sales price for SF homes (houses, condos & TICs) jogs up and down naturally without great implications for market values. The average median sales price for the entire 25 months was $688,000; in April 2011, it was $695,000; two years ago, it was $684,000. The media gets excited by monthly changes in median price, but when one steps back, one sees a remarkably stable market. And though the median fell more than usual in this past January and February, a decline is actually common for January and February (due to holiday market dynamics). The decline was a bit more dramatic this year due to an increase in low-end distress home sales. When market values really start to definitively change, either up or down, it will be reflected consistently over a longer term than just 1, 2 or 3 months.

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Average Dollar per Square Foot
    These charts show the average dollar per square foot for sold SF houses (top) and sold SF condos (bottom) over the past 13 months. Again, we see the average naturally jogs up and down. It’s simply that in different months, different homes sell at different prices and different dollar per square foot figures. Changes in market values will be signified by consistent changes over longer periods than 1 to 3 months.

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Listings Accepting Offers
    The upper chart tracks the number of SF home listings accepting offers over the past 25 months; the lower tracks the percentage of listings accepting offers (going under contract). Accepted offer activity is the most current statistic available as to the heat of the market. Last spring, the March and April market was super-charged by the double tax credit expiring on 4/30/10 (the market then crashed in May), but this spring it’s just as strong, with no tax credit, and reduced inventory. As a percentage of listings going under contract, the last 3 months are as strong or stronger as any in years. At this point, we see no signs of it declining significantly in May 2011. (Knock on wood)

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Homes $1,000,000 & Above
    The top chart shows half the reason why the median sales price plunged in January and February: there were simply drastically fewer high-end home sales closing (a not unusual dynamic reflecting the holiday season market). In February, per the lower chart, the number of high-end SF homes accepting offers rebounded (and has stayed high), which began to be reflected in March’s sales numbers. There is a 4 to 8 week lag between accepted offers and closed sales. Low inventory is an issue for higher-end home listings as well: it is currently 26% below last year’s inventory.

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Homes for Sale
    The dark red columns show the number of listings active at any time during the month; the pink columns show those active on the last day of the month. Inventory has remained low this spring, especially when compared to buyer demand. The number of active SF listings on April 30th was 16% below that one year earlier. The number of city home sales would almost certainly be higher if the inventory of homes for sale wasn’t so constrained. This has also led to a more competitive environment for motivated buyers considering appealing, well-priced homes.

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Months Supply of Inventory (MSI)
    (For houses and condos) High demand/low inventory means very low MSI statistics. It is as low as it has been in years, certainly since the market adjustment that occurred in September 2008. (The low April 2010 MSI reflects the frenzy to get offers accepted before the double tax credit expired on 4/30/10.) The lower the MSI, the stronger the market. Typically, under 3 months of inventory would be considered a “seller’s market.”

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Average Days on Market (DOM)
    One more statistic indicating a market heating up. April’s days-on-market figure for San Francisco houses and condos accepting offers is well below any for the year prior.

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Distress Home Sales (REO & Short Sales)
    As a percentage of sales (not shown in these charts), SF distress home sales (bank-owned and short sales) soared in January and February to their highest levels ever (24% and 26% respectively). This is another reason why the overall median sales price plunged in these months. However, in March the percentage declined to 21%, and in April still further to 18%. In the charts below, we see that the absolute number of city distress sales hit its high mark in March before dropping significantly in April. The number of active distress listings has been declining since November, but compared to regular homes, these listings take much longer to work their way from active to under contract to close of escrow. Because dealing with banks on these deals is about the most complicated and aggravating experience in real estate. (A lot of these deals fall though.)

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Distress House Sales by Neighborhood
    There are two types of distress sales, the bank-owned sale typically pursuant to a foreclosure (often in distressed condition) and short sales, where lender has to agree to a reduction on the mortgage owed for the sale to close (usually not in distressed condition). In the chart below, the red and dark gray portions of each column indicate the respective numbers of distress house sales and regular home sales by neighborhood. Districts 10 & 3, running across the southern boundary of the city, Bayview to Oceanview, make up 60% of all distress house sales (135 in 6 months). In all other areas, the percentage of distress house sales is much less and they have had much less impact (or even no impact) on general values.

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Distress Condo Sales by Neighborhood
    The red and dark gray portions reflect the numbers of distress and regular condo sales respectively. The area hit most dramatically by distress condo sales is the greater South of Market area (in District 9), where most of the big new condo developments went up in recent years. There were 98 distress condo sales there in 6 months, making up almost 50% of the city’s total. Many of the other neighborhoods with large numbers of condo sales were barely affected by bank-owned and short sales.

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Mortgage Rates
    As seen in this 3-month chart of 30-year mortgage rates from Bankrate.com, interest rates have been declining recently and continue to be at historically extremely low levels. This has a huge impact on the cost of home ownership.

    Paragon Real Estate Group
    click for larger image

    Excellent, Positive News for San Francisco

    by admin | Wednesday, 4 May, 2011



    Tech jobs near all-time highs, fuel office-space boom

    PriceWaterhouseCoopers: S.F. an opportunity leader

    “Actually, it’s the third-most opportunity-rich city in the world, according to PricewaterhouseCoopers, the global accountancy and business consulting firm….Analyzing data from 26 world cities – “all capitals of finance, commerce and culture” – San Francisco ranks just behind New York and Toronto, and ahead of London, Paris, Singapore, Hong Kong and Chicago, among others in the top 10, according to the report.”

    And, the award for the United States’ best vacation spot goes to: … San Francisco.

    “That’s according to U.S. News’ latest USA Destination Rankings, which also chose San Francisco as the “best summer destination.” …Worldwide, San Francisco ranks No. 4, behind Paris, Barcelona and London (travel.usnews.com).”

    Read More…

    How do Distress Sales Affect Median Prices in San Francisco?

    by Paragon Specific | Sunday, 17 April, 2011

    Distress home sales – bank-owned properties and short sales – have a major impact on the overall median sales price in San Francisco, even though the city is much less impacted by such sales than the greater Bay Area or California. In actual numbers and as a percentage of sales, distress sales have been increasing in the city in the first quarter of 2011 – now running at 20% – 25% of sales — and since distress sales are by far the lowest-priced sales, they drag down the overall median price for San Francisco. (The median price is that price at which half the sales occur for more and half for less, so it is mostly affected by the quantity of sales at different price points. It has no relation to average sales price.)

    The median sales price in March in SF dropped 5% from March 2010, (from $710,000 to $675,000) and it is mostly because of the increasing number of distress sales. But if we break down the statistics, we find that the median price for distress sales over that period dropped from $470,500 to $441,000, but the median price for regular home sales stayed virtually the same, actually going up a tad from $750,000 in March 2010 to $759,500 in March 2011. That is, distress sales are impacting the overall SF median price due to their increasing numbers and decreasing prices, but not the overall, regular, non-distress median home price.

    In fact, the regular median-home price has been generally stable for the last 20 – 24 months, and shows no sign of declining.

    Why is that? It’s because distress sales are clustered in specific neighborhoods and impact the values there, while having little or no impact on most of the neighborhoods of San Francisco. If you want to buy a house in Pacific Heights, the fact that you can buy a foreclosure house, with the fixtures ripped out, in Bayview doesn’t make much difference to you. To a large degree, the distress home market and the regular home market in San Francisco are different markets in different neighborhoods with different buyers.

    In fact, buyer demand — as measured by months’ supply of inventory, average days on market, percentage of listings accepting offers and other statistical parameters – has significantly improved since 2011 began, for both distress homes (albeit with declining prices) and for non-distress homes (with generally stable prices, with perhaps the beginning of a slight upward pressure on values).

    As can be seen in the two charts below, distress house sales continue to be clustered in Realtor Districts 3 & 10, the band of less affluent neighborhoods that run along the southern border of the city. Together, they make up about 60% of all distress house sales, and their home values have been hugely affected by such sales. Other areas, such as Districts 5, Noe/Castro/Haight, and 7, Pacific Heights/Marina, have had very few distress sales and they have virtually no impact on values there.

    Distress condo sales are mostly clustered in the SOMA/ South Beach/ Mission Bay area where the huge new developments went up in the past 10 years, and that is the area where condo values have been impacted most. On a percentage basis, again Districts 3 & 10 have been deeply affected, but in absolute numbers, their condo markets are relatively small.

    Buyer’s Market Spurs Confidence in Young Professionals and Affluent Homeowners

    by admin | Tuesday, 5 April, 2011

    “As the cold temperatures become a distant memory, and the spring selling season gains momentum, consumers have come to agree on one thing—now’s a good time to get off the fence and into the real estate market. This is the overall theme in the latest American Express Spending and Saving Tracker survey, a monthly survey that tracks the spending and saving habits of consumers in order to get an indication of what’s happening in the market. “This month’s Spending and Saving Tracker provided an up-to-date look at various consumer trends and gave us the opportunity to assess how consumers are feeling about the current market in addition to gauging homeowner confidence,” says Leah Gerstner, vice president of public affairs at American Express.

    “This month’s survey points to the fact that consumers overwhelmingly feel that we are in the midst of a buyer’s market,” she adds. The data also points to the fact that a seller’s market is at least a year away, which is certainly positive news. While homeowners aren’t necessarily willing to settle for less than the asking price when selling their home, two of the biggest areas of interest in the latest survey deal with homeowners including home improvement projects on their to-do list, as well as the willingness to include concessions to get their home sold.”

    Click here to read the rest of the article.

    It might sell papers, but …

    by admin | Monday, 7 February, 2011

    Last Sunday, the the San Francisco Chronicle, had another alarmist article on the SF home market, with, of course, the usual cascade of reader comments from those who want the world economy and property owners in particular to “get what they deserve.” 

    The main point of the article is that foreclosure sales are surging in even the better neighborhoods of the city, and bad times are coming but the figures and examples cited just don’t add up.

    Here’s a sample quote from the article:

    “Still, more people are falling behind on their mortgage payments. Some 1,885 San Francisco households received notices of default, the first step in the foreclosure process, in 2010, DataQuick said. That was down from 2009′s record number, but still more than double the historic average.”

    How exactly does a reduction from 2009 = “more people falling behind”? Also, one should note that a notice of default does not necessarily imply a forthcoming foreclosure. It means someone was late paying their mortgage.

    Another article quote:

    “In San Francisco, the 709 foreclosures represented just 0.052 percent of all households, DataQuick said, while in Contra Costa the foreclosure rate was 2.3 percent. In the nine-county Bay Area, 1.78 percent of all households went through bank repossession in 2010.”

    Here’s a salient point of the whole article: the SF foreclosure rate is 70% below the 9-county Bay Area rate. And if you broke off the northern part of the city, it would probably be 88-90 % below the Bay Area rate.

    The article makes a lot of comparisons of 2010 with 2007, but we all know the market went through a wrenching change in autumn 2008. The issue isn’t where the market went from its peak, but where it is now, and 2010 unit sales were above those of 2009, and median prices have now been stable for 7 quarters (21 months). Market activity since September 2010 has been quite strong and it appears that national economic conditions are improving.

    Here are some statistics from MLS pulled this week:

    Continue Reading…

    2011 Rate Outlook

    by admin | Sunday, 6 February, 2011

    Julian Hebron of RPM Mortgage has writes in his blog The Basis Point, as have many others recently that rates are going to go up in 2011.  But the difference is that he presents an excellent, easy to understand history and analysis of why. 

    Rates are expected to go up by about .75% by the end of 2011.  This translates to about $450 a month difference in interest payments on a $729000 high balance conforming mortgage and $260 a month difference on a conforming loan of $417000.   So if you are thinking of buying or refinancing, the potential for imminent rate increases are worth taking into account in your plans.  

    Julian writes, “Before presenting rate predictions for 2011, it’s worth noting that all forecasts are subject to the whims of highly volatile rate markets. What follows is an explanation of how rate markets work, how rates have behaved since the financial crisis began in 2007, then the outlook for this year.”

    Read more on The Basis Point